"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." Margaret Mead (Mostly what other say will be in italics, what I say will not. There will be occasions when this is messed up or forgotten, but generally it will true- for those keeping track of the opining vs the reporting!)
Showing posts with label regulation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label regulation. Show all posts
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Is it Allowed or Not?
TSA's own guidelines allow photographs to be taken
How do they get away with preventing it if it IS allowed? Yeah, yeah, rhetorical question :)
How do they get away with preventing it if it IS allowed? Yeah, yeah, rhetorical question :)
Wednesday, December 09, 2009
Monday, November 23, 2009
Swwep the Street
Steve Kyle at AmericaBlog has a long post on the benefits (financial, economic, and psychic) of reigning in the obscene profits (for basically doing nothing) of Goldman and their ilk. Being an investor, and primarily in the instruments in question (deriviatives), I'm leery of over-regulation (or random regulation)
But since the 'repeal' of Glass-Stegall in 99, the proitability of the majors has skyrocketed, primarily on the creation of ether, and the stability of the market has plummeted. Market efficiency has been shown to be an elusive dream in the face of obscene short term profits. Who cares if the market crashes next week, if I can get my 1.5 billion today- it'll still be worth a half billion afterwards BOOHOOSo this is one case where I'm all in favor of regulation, even if it may hurt me in the short run. This has to be reined in, or the idiots on the Street will destroy the system.
I think he sums it up well when he says "I, for one, would be very happy with less efficiency but more stability." Amen.
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
We're So Over Overdraft Fees
This is good... the banks, particularly the meganationals are out of control (on so many levels, but that's 15 or 20 other posts....)
Not Sure Where This Is Going
Iyee! I want regulation of the finserv business (with teeth!) but let's keep Congress as far from the levers as possible. If they want to set limits or triggers in the establishing legislation fine, but not on a day to day basis. Yeesh. Michele Bachman or Mike Pence with a foot on the accelerator (or brake) scares the piss out of me.
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Sunday, November 23, 2008
Amen Corner
I'm not the biggest Cramer fan in the worled, but his comments, recorded in Stan Yee's post here, echo my thinking. Two of the best things Obama can do to right the sinking ship of Wall Street are get rid of Chris Cox, head of the SEC, and bring back the up-tick rule.
I've posted (below) on the need to re-regulate and Cramer just reinforces my opinion there, on the up-tick rule. Chris Cox is Reagan-Republic, Laffer Curve, trickle-down, cut-the-tax kinda guy; just what we DON'T need in the current debacle. As with most Bush appointments, he was long on Bushie dogma and short on clues.
Bottom line: "You want order restored, the markets to work again, an end to the endless sowing of fear? Then bring back the rules we put in place to avoid another Great Crash. The uptick rule wasn't broken, but the SEC 'fixed' it and put the 'fix' in for the shorts. It's time to give the longs back a level playing field, stop the rigging of the market by the shorts, and bring capitalism, not capital destruction, back to our markets."
I've posted (below) on the need to re-regulate and Cramer just reinforces my opinion there, on the up-tick rule. Chris Cox is Reagan-Republic, Laffer Curve, trickle-down, cut-the-tax kinda guy; just what we DON'T need in the current debacle. As with most Bush appointments, he was long on Bushie dogma and short on clues.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)